Hi, > i'm just accidentally recognize that on rhel-6: > ---------------------------------------------- > # rpm -qpi rhnsd-4.9.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm > warning: rhnsd-4.9.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: > NOKEY, key ID f21541eb > Name : rhnsd Relocations: (not relocatable) > Version : 4.9.3 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. > Release : 2.el6 Build Date: Wed 24 Mar 2010 > 03:11:14 PM CET > Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: > ls20-bc2-13.build.redhat.com > Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: > rhnsd-4.9.3-2.el6.src.rpm > Size : 92865 License: GPLv2 > Signature : RSA/8, Tue 20 Apr 2010 07:50:37 PM CEST, Key ID > 938a80caf21541eb > Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> > URL : https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk > Summary : CentOS Network query daemon > Description : > The CentOS Update Agent that automatically queries the CentOS > Network servers and determines which packages need to be updated on > your machine, and runs any actions. > ---------------------------------------------- > did you see the strange thing? (i run ths command on a centos system) > so if centos just rebuild the same src.rpm then do not need to modify > the package and the spec! (ok this pacakge won't be included in centos > anyway, just an example) since in that case the buildhost and vendor > changed because of the build system and the summary and other part will > change "automagically" even if the spec file contains _hard coded_ "Red > Hat". this can save same useless work.. Seems to be pushed directly from Spacewalk repos. Guess they might 'fix' it before release. -- Greets Marcus