Hi Alain. >> Great to have you back. Hope everything is fine so far. > > This connection ends tomorrow. I'm glad to to communicate myself with > you all at this time. Don't know what will happen tomorrow so I'll try > to upload as much as possible for you all to check. > >>>> Besides that Alain's plan was to create one design for all releases. I >>>> am not going to follow this track as imho every release should be >>>> visually unique (which is also good for promotion) >>> >>> good for promotion ? what about corporate visual identity ? what is >>> your idea exactly ? >> >> My idea is to make every major release visually unique. There should >> be something like motto which should be kept on minor releases. Maybe >> even NO artwork change on minor releases could be an option. > > I'm just worried about maintainance issues of one visually unique > schema per major release. The CentOS projects maintain near to 4 major > releases at the same time. Let's see what happen after uploading the > centos-artwork-repo-0.0.1.tar.bz2 file. Keep monitoring > http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork page. I will upload an 8MB file to it, > and if connection is still active I will try to start uploading things > up to https://projects.centos.org/svn/artwork structure. Maintenance of dedicated artworks per major release is much easier than updating artwork of !every! release on a change of the 'unique' artwork. But I agree, in general we should not change artwork in minor releases. >> For RHEL 6 we have to create some additional stuff as rhgb has been >> replaced with plymouth. > > Yes, plymouth is something we need to introduce inside artwork > repository rendering structure. I have already taken a look at plymouth. From my observation bg color is set during compile time so we need to check the code, too (similar to rhgb). Best Regards Marcus