Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Joseph L. Casale > <jcasale at activenetwerx.com> wrote: > >>>> Funny, there was just a thread on the extra repo's drbd packages today >>>> in the drbd list. Given those packages have bugs and are not really >>>> maintained, along with the fact of how easy it is to make rpm's directly >>>> from source (lacking kmod though) might it be wise to drop them? > >>> I saw a brief discussion on this subject (maintaining drbd etc) on the >>> centos-devel IRC channel not long ago. Maybe this matter should be >>> discussed in the -devel mailing list ?? I would like to hear from >>> core CentOS devs. > >> As suggested, I am posting here to get the dev feedback, clearly having >> kmods is a much better solution than linbits approach, but the existing >> bugs will likely catch most new uses off guard. > > I have edited the subject line to make clear what we are going to discuss. :D > > I remember the major work of the last update was done by Ralph with > extensive help from Fabian and other community members. I hope they > can continue the effort. :) > > Akemi > +1 .. especially because i have to setup a new DRBD cluster on CentOS 5.x in the following weeks ;-) -- -- Fabian Arrotin test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger )