----- "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: <snip> | yes, I dont think we will have nearly as much traffic on these arch's | to | merit putting them on the main mirror system. I'd be willing to host the side arches as a mirror. I'm already hosting Ubuntu, a soon to be full CentOS mirror and a soon to be Fedora Enchilada mirror | > Probably the CentOS infrastructure team need to discuss this | > as to where reference 'side architecture' CentOS builds will | > 'live', outside the general mirroring | | good point, I've added it to the list of things. | | > Once I have a bootstrap into CentOS 5, and then 6 as time | > indicates, it may well be possible to 'wire' a ground up | > rebuild on the current CentOS builder and testing process, and | > any future builds into that current process | | Sounds good! There is some work that Ray has been doing as well, and I | | think we should have install media for centos-5 out from there in the | | next few days. Let me collect packages and put them on dev.c.o. But | you | raise an interesting point w.r.t 5 and 6 - at this stage, is it worth | | considering 6 to be a more productive target than 5 for arch's that | will | be supported through to 6 ( ie, not ia64 ) ? You are correct. IMHO perhaps we should target the upcoming 6 packages. When 6 is released we plan to go to it ASAP. I'm already certifying the RHEL 6 platform for our environment using the RHEL 6 Beta software. | > The unit also 'tweets' its progress at | > http://twitter.com/buildmonbot | | nice! Very cool indeed. :) -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier at sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca MSN : subatomic_spam at hotmail.com Does your OS has a man 8 lart? http://www.xinu.nl/unix/humour/asr-manpages/lart.html