On 11/26/2010 05:54 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote: > +1 for an optional repository. > I like the name :) I am not sold on the idea of calling it 'optional' - as mentioned before, we dont really have a supported and optional model in CentOS. Does everyone really want to go with the 'optional' name ? > Besides that I am not a fan of different installation medias for > workstation and server. One of the advantages of CentOS always was to > allow installation of both with one media kit. cool! - KB