Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/26/2010 07:07 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> I do like the idea of having abrt working for next release, aka 6.1 >> though. Now that the problem/issue was identified and that a correct fix >> implies development (not a single patch), i'd rather see it postponed >> than the whole distro. > > I would be happy with that personally. But I *would* like to take steps > to make sure that CentOS installs dont hit resources not hosted at > *.centos.org > Is abrt running during anaconda install process ? i know that it's the case in beta2refresh but don't know if it is in 6.0 GA. That would indeed mean that abrt should still be built and provided with centos 6.0 and so maybe just disabling/identifying what needs to be done just to be sure that it doesn't hit @redhat.com machines. But i'm still thinking that the specific abrt plugin to report bugs in the centos mantis bug report system should be postponed, except if a python guru can write it in 2 minutes and that it can be tested directly in the QA process. -- -- Fabian Arrotin