[CentOS-devel] handling ABRT

Fri Nov 26 19:27:03 UTC 2010
Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net>

Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote:
>> I'd stick with bugzilla instance.
>> - upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration
>> - it's working now, we need only bz instance

Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that 
he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-)

>> - no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream
> Not entire sure if upstream would be happy to have that in, and once we 
> release something - its quite hard to completely remove it from the wild.
> I guess its a question we can ask

If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the 
abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There 
would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and 
report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/

Fabian Arrotin