On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Leonard den Ottolander < leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote: > Hello Sergio, > > On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:23 +0100, Sergio Rubio wrote: > > Had a few issues building x86_64 gcc from upstream rhel6 sources also. > > I was building using a beta2 workstation install. > > > I've shared them in case you are interested: > > What I'm doing is a fun build, so thanks for the offer but I will > continue building this system by myself. > > Building both glibc's in a mock root (with redhat-rpm-config) installed > resulted in two rpms that did not conflict with one another, so I could > continue building gcc in the updated mock root. The x86_64 version > compiled fine so far, going to start the i686 build in a minute. I > suppose my guess that the difference in check summing in the original > builds was the cause of my issue was right. At least it had something to > do with the macro setup as the absence of redhat-rpm-config was the only > difference in both build environments. > Great, let us know how it goes please. I'm particularly interested in the result. If you could share the mock config used after that, If'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks for sharing. > Regards, > Leonard. > > -- > mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- FrameOS Linux website: http://www.frameos.org <http://www.frameos.org> twitter: @rubiojr blog: http://blog.frameos.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20101125/fb63f3fc/attachment-0007.html>