On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Sergio Rubio wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Leonard den Ottolander < > leonard at den.ottolander.nl> wrote: > >> Hello Sergio, >> >> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 12:50 +0100, Sergio Rubio wrote: >>> If you could share the mock config used after that, If'd greatly >>> appreciate it. >> >> I'm using the epel-6-x86_64 and epel-6-i386 configs from the rebuilt >> Fedora 14 1.1.6-1 srpm - you need pigz from Fedora too -, enabling the >> beta and beta-optional repos. (Some of the devel packages are only >> available in beta-optional.) To this I added a local repo >> "updates" (using a file:// baseurl) - I commented out the default >> "updates" repo to avoid naming conflicts but you could use a different >> name instead - to which I copy the resulting rpms. This way the build >> roots automatically get updated with the fresh rpms after an invocation >> of >> $ creatrepo . >> in the repo directory and a subsequent mock rebuild. >> >> Since binutils didn't need an update going from 6beta to 6 I currently >> only have the mock roots patched with the glibc-2.12-1.7.el6 and related >> rpms. Next I will be adding the gcc-4.4.4-13.el6 and related rpms so >> subsequent packages will be build with the new compiler. >> > > Thanks for the input. Greatly appreciated. > > I'm using a similar strategy, though my mock is older. I'll give it a try. RPMforge provides working mock packages for RHEL5 and RHEL6. Those packages can be found at: http://packages.sw.be/mock/ Kind regards, -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]