On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 25/11/2010 21:54, Dag Wieers wrote: >> The thread is about a conflict when rebuilding a RHEL source package, > > and this isnt the rebuilding-rhel-devel-list It's the closest there is. >> which incidentally is what CentOS is doing. > > so should we all move to the lkml since that's effectively what it all > boils down to, isn't it ? No, except if you think in black-and-white. > I'm guessing you missed the bit where I had previously confirmed that we > didn't have any such problem. Which basicly means the thread was fine, until you got fed up with where it was going. Not sure why me mentioning the mock builds triggered you. >> And the C in CentOS stands for >> community, but it's very clear you don't want to have anything to do with >> that. > > I know you like to beat that drum often, but then I guess thats your > right too. Only why I think you're unreasonable. It is in fact very similar to when you objected when I announced the availability of kmod packages for eg. CentOS. That was considered off-topic as well. Maybe we ought to make the mailinglists moderated so you can select what doesn't trigger you ? -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]