Le 26/11/10 04:02, Douglas McClendon a écrit : > On 11/25/2010 07:04 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Karanbir Singh<mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> On 25/11/2010 22:37, Dag Wieers wrote: >>>>> and this isnt the rebuilding-rhel-devel-list >>>> It's the closest there is. >>> that does not make it right or welcome. I made a polite request >> In my opinion, it's both right and welcome. This list is my *one* >> connection to this technical "circle". If I had OP's problem, this is >> certainly the first list I would look to for an answer. Thinking of >> the definition of CentOS, if you want no part of a >> rebuilding-rhel-devel-list, then maybe you should not be on *this* >> list, or just not be *rebuilding* rhel in the first place, hmm? >> >> Further, you're "polite request" sounds more like passive-aggressive > > As an observer who has been entirely guilty of being poisonly dramatic > on other fedora-lists, but who has hopefully matured, I have to agree > with this. On the other hand I also have to say that Dag's responses > were equivalently thoughtless in regard to actually building up the > community, instead of just inciting KS to dig deeper into his position. > > On the other other hand, that doesn't mean I think those 'thoughtless' > comments were wrong. I.e. if KS really does feel that strongly, > moderation is the real answer that would facilitate a community without > these sorts of non-productive, community-poisoning heal-digging-in drama > fests. > > $0.02... > > -dmc Each Flag war is shamefull for the protagonists and hurts all the community. I'd rather read some less appropriated topics than I can quickly bypass if I don't feel concerned. Technical debates are welcome, Personal conflicts are unpolite. Centos merits better. JML