2010/11/26 Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>: > On 11/26/2010 12:35 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: >> My suggestion: Let's do it just like Red Hat. > > Why ? Because it is much clearer. A desktop / workstation version and a server version. (With the same repos) If someone is missing something he can still install it with yum. > >> CentOS 6 Server (about 3,2 GB) >> CentOS 6 Workstation (about 4 GB) > > What about the other variants ? The client variant? >> [os] >> [updates] >> [optional] >> [extras] > > So, are you saying use 'optional' and put updates for pkgs into the same > place ? To prevent these problems, I propose to use an extra update repo for optional packages. For example: [optional-updates] > On the other hand, retaining the name 'optional' might make it easier > for people comparing upstream and centos - and perhaps share configs. I am sure to continue to use [optional]. Best regards, Morten