On 11/26/2010 02:19 PM, Jean-Marc Liger wrote: >> Then stick with what we have done in the past, use the isos to reflect >> whats in [os], create the ability for people to use the [optional] repo >> at install time and go with that. The iso content would be dictated by >> the merged iso contents from upstream, so we retain the CentOS<= 5 >> process in that regard. >> >> Continuing on the same idea, one thing that came up was reporpose the >> Extras/ repo and use that to host these 'additional/optional' packages. >> Given that it changes a massive user expectation - unless there is very >> good reasoning to do this, lets try and avoid this. > > does CentOS-6 extras repo will contain some stuff which will be extra > from Upstream ? same question for addons and contrib ? > IMHO, keeping close to upstream schema is better for people are mixing RHEL/CentOS so their config / script (yum specific) can be shared easily ; BTW, make a remix/livecd/livedvd should be easy using fedora's livecd-tools because RHEL6/CentOS6 are based on Fedora 12/13 Regards. -- Athmane Madjoudj