On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/26/2010 01:11 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> I suggest you read it again, because your 'which basicly means' is >>> incorrect. >> As you stated yourself, you are being pedantic. And I think you are >> deliberately making this thread more worse than it should be. > > Being pedantic does not imply I am wrong. Your basis for the argument is > flawed, and the lengths you are going to in order to circumvent that > issue is odd. Huh, I stated that we have mock packages for RHEL5 and RHEL6, which definitely is useful for a centos-devel list. >> Explain to me how sending two mails to find users to test, is "repeated >> spamming" ? And while you know better, you can't resist the urge to >> disinform. > > So you dont think its worth sticking with the same policy for you as it > does for everyone else ? I'm not disinforming about anything but > clearing out the crazy FUD you are trying to create here. No, you said I was spamming, which I was not. And I fail to see how informing about mock packages is FUD. >> I do think the problem is the content, as much as you don't like me >> mentioning we have alternative kmod-drbd packages (that actualy get >> updated frequently), you don't like others to discuss transparancy wrt. >> the build process or alternatives. > > FUD... You clearly don't get it, why not stop trying and stop giving > yourself all the grief ? What grief ? >> Well, this is the Internet, get used to it. > > I am also fairly sure that the 'internet' does not imply freedom to do > as you want, when you want, where you want - and suite yourself in > anyway you like with no response from anyone. Its the 'where' bit that > you need to go think about a bit. I think you are turning things around, I am not trying to shut a discussion down. I didn't do anything wrong by posting there are recent mock packages available. Spam and FUD, what's next... -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]