> On 11/26/2010 07:21 PM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>> I would be happy with that personally. But I *would* like to take steps >>> to make sure that CentOS installs dont hit resources not hosted at >>> *.centos.org >> But i'm still thinking that the specific abrt plugin to report bugs in >> the centos mantis bug report system should be postponed, except if a >> python guru can write it in 2 minutes and that it can be tested directly >> in the QA process. > > Aologies for not being clear on this - but that's mostly what I meant; > we can retain abrt but disable it from hitting non .centos.org places; > in the mean time do the work for making abrt work against bugs.c.o and > ship that once its ready. > > Lets see what Yoinier comes back with. He will almost certainly need to > look at both the bits of code and then do an estimate on how much work > is needed and how long its likely to take. We would / could then decide > on the 6.0/6.1 timeline. from a quick once-over of the code, resubmitting to a bugzilla instance hosted at centos only requires a change to a config file. I'm gonna try building it and see if there's anything more regarding plugins that we can disable at runtime, but this looks quite easy *if* we have a bugzilla.c.o. I'm monitoring the bug. I'll put anything that I find in there. Matt > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >