hi, I am guessing most people have looked at the larger-than-DVD install tree's in the shape of the 'base' and 'optional' repos in rhel6-beta. When it comes to us doing the tree's there are a couple of options, one of which might be to stick with 'base' and 'optional' repositories. But I am fairly sure that Red Hat will productise their tree's into the various varients ( Workstation, Server, Cluster Suite etc ) and drop the 'optional' repo to make things look a lot more like the EL5 tree's. Since we mix all the tree's into one - that creates the issue we have with 5.5/x86_64/DVD1 and DVD2. Not ideal. I have a couple of ideas on this, but would like to hear what everyone else thinks is the best way to handle this. Keep in mind that we want to try to ensure that all kickstart / tools / code written for RHEL should justwork on CentOS ( well, as much as is possible ). - KB