On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/07/2011 05:35 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > What sort of test would SL binaries fail that would keep them from being > > accepted in CentOS? Isn't that the kind of problem that has to be > > solved to speed up a release? > > No, the two things are orthogonal. Assurance that a package does what it > says its going to do is something that needs to be addressed I don't think so. I think that is upstream's problem. We need assurance that what is produced is functionally the same as what upstream produces (except for the very few areas where CentOS functionality differs). > - not directly connected to what the input to the testing harness is or > what comes out from the other end.