On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > anaconda different in i386 and x86_64 either both should have to be > > anaconda-11.1.2.224-1.el5.centos or both should have to be > > anaconda-11.1.2.224-1.el5.centos.1 > > This is a good point. We had quite a lot of issues getting anaconda to > build and the final builds were actually done by hand. That's quite worrying. Are the precise steps you took to "build by hand" recorded anywhere? Are the numerous issues you had in getting anaconda to build recorded, e.g. in a bug tracker? > Both the src.rpm's are in the srpms repo. I do try and keep the two in > sync most times. "most times", eh? > Depending on how far we get with the srpms today, we can push these out > as well. They are all built ( including the plus kernel, which still > needs to be tested ), just awaiting b/w for release. Do you have a new ETA for release of the SRPMS? Thanks.