[CentOS-devel] progress?

Larry Vaden vaden at texoma.net
Wed Feb 23 04:21:00 UTC 2011


On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens
<mstevens at imt-systems.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/23 John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com>:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:56:12AM +0100, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Just take the missing build dependencies from Fedora 12/13. Red Hat
>>> has probably done the same.
>>
>>        "Just", "probably".  Do these types of guessing games work out
>>        well for you in your professional life?
>
> Look here:
> https://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/6x/build/problembyrpm
>
> Otherwise you cannot build these packages.

If RedHat were to be assigned a grade of "C" for this, it would surely
be interesting to know which distros get a "D" or "F".

Lamar's use of "sniggles" seems more succinct each day as the Team reveals more.

Note that Troy's litmus test in the list is "wouldn't build" and that
could explain the difference between Troy's count and Karanbir's
count.

Are there honest security types on the list who would like to comment
on whether this lack of QA could have potential security
ramifications?



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list