[CentOS-devel] progress?

+1 on your response, Taimur.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Taimur Gibran <taimurgibran at gmail.com>wrote:

> Fellows, Karanbir just answered what we all wanted to know. There are no
> reasons to keep this stupid conversation/fight.
>
> 2011/2/17 jean-seb <jsh at interlug.net>
>
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> theses words are just stupid (sorry, but I'm bored to read stuff like
>> that "if you're unhappy, buy RH and Shut up"):
>>
>> Ok, so that mean Centos is just a sand box and they should indicate in
>> the web site:
>> "Warning, This projet is just for fun, do not use for production" ????
>> You cannot, in a side be "an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution" (see
>> http://www.centos.org/) and
>> in the other side said "take source and build your own";
>> It's important to be coherent ....
>> So if Centos cannot be reactive about security update ... remove the
>> "Enterprise-class" from the web site
>> and be clear about that.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> js.
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 17/02/2011 18:20, dsieme01 at yahoo.com a écrit :
>> > You are free to take source and build your own package or buy redhat,
>> oracle or other. Beating up Volunteers will not serve the community.
>> >
>> > We owe the community for their work, not the other way around.
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone, powered by Cricket.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net>
>> > Sender: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
>> > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:13:35
>> > To: The CentOS developers mailing list.<centos-devel at centos.org>
>> > Reply-To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <
>> centos-devel at centos.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] progress?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I, for one, do not think it is normal existing user's security is 2 or
>> 3
>> >> months at stake.
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > regards/ldv/vaden at texoma.net
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CentOS-devel mailing list
>> > CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CentOS-devel mailing list
>> > CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>> >
>> >
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iD8DBQFNXTHpu8lcDdFEGbYRAkOJAJ9KqWIdNp2ohDG7MKfHC88iXacBEgCfZhsr
>> qUIfqWDx5PYNv3EA4YkTDMk=
>> =3Fk8
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Taimur Gibran Rabuske Kuntz
> Researcher at Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuits Research Unit
> INESC-ID - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores -
> Investigação e Desenvolvimento
> Lisbon - Portugal
> -----------------------------------------------------
> GPG keyID: D4D0FEB8 @ pgp.mit.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110217/e235dc2a/attachment-0001.html>