[CentOS-devel] progress?
Larry Vaden
vaden at texoma.netWed Feb 23 02:31:13 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] progress?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] progress?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com> wrote: > > But if you CAN detect "hidden" or "missing" (and I'm quite sure Johnny can), > then adding a dependency is likely best for everyone involved, policy be damned. > > Why re-distribute SRPM's with "hidden" (or missing) dependencies? That > kinda misses the point of dependencies in package metadata. +1 (read: Amen!)
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] progress?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] progress?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list