[CentOS-devel] progress?

Thu Feb 17 14:34:23 UTC 2011
jean-seb <jsh at interlug.net>

Hash: SHA1

theses words are just stupid (sorry, but I'm bored to read stuff like
that "if you're unhappy, buy RH and Shut up"):

Ok, so that mean Centos is just a sand box and they should indicate in
the web site:
"Warning, This projet is just for fun, do not use for production" ????
You cannot, in a side be "an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution" (see
http://www.centos.org/) and
in the other side said "take source and build your own";
It's important to be coherent ....
So if Centos cannot be reactive about security update ... remove the
"Enterprise-class" from the web site
and be clear about that.



Le 17/02/2011 18:20, dsieme01 at yahoo.com a écrit :
> You are free to take source and build your own package or buy redhat,
oracle or other. Beating up Volunteers will not serve the community.
> We owe the community for their work, not the other way around.
> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone, powered by Cricket.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net>
> Sender: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:13:35
> To: The CentOS developers mailing list.<centos-devel at centos.org>
> Reply-To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] progress?
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> wrote:
>> I, for one, do not think it is normal existing user's security is 2 or 3
>> months at stake.
> +1
> regards/ldv/vaden at texoma.net
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/