Le 18/02/11 20:32, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit : > js wrote: >>> If you don't like it .. don't use it. >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> You don't understand, I think, the meaning of my email: >>> When someone said "Ok, buy a RH license" to end a discussion and don't >>> talk about problems >>> is just not a good approch. > What problems? CentOS is/will be only 3-4 weeks behind Oracle > Unbreakable Linux, and 0-2 weeks behind Scientific Linux, in both cases > with PAID developers. So about WHAT problems are you talking about? > See previous emails please. >> My mail is not (to be clear) against Centos, but against those who use >> the "do it yourself" just to shutdown all >> argument :) > We understand it EXTREMELY well. First of all, just to be clear, I have > not contributed to the CentOS project in any measurable way. I did > create public repo for CentOS desktop apps and I did create/recompiled > 40-50 packages for CentOS in last few years, but no one ever contacted > me about it, and MAYBE 2-3 developers ever browsed it. > > Having that in mind, I claim that if you do not like how this (or any > other open source project) is managed, it's speed of releases or any > other aspect, you have 3 options: > 1. Contribute your time and knowledge to that project. If it's open > 2. Create a fork of the project and contribute your time and knowledge > to that project. Seems to be on the way > 3. After negative response to initial question(s) about things becoming > better use it but do not complain any more. > > You can hold someone responsible for not making your life better only in > the degree of how much you (or someone else in your name) paid him. If > he is not paid for it, you have NO MORAL RIGHT to complaint to him > (after initial complaint). > > Ljubomir excellent proof of ignorance about the functioning of free software in general I'm stopping before godwin point :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110218/57851f93/attachment-0005.html>