On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 04:03 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> One is not expected to criticize on this list. All is well. Don't ask any
>> uncomfortable questions please ! It's normal for a RHEL rebuild to be
>> months behind the original. It has never been different for years. Either
>> shut up or pay for the real thing. The developers are doing the best they
>> can. Again all is well. Don't believe the non-believers.
>
> You are such a baby Dag.
If after so many years we still have the same issues, and the same threads
and arguments come up, including the promise to fix it after the release
gets out, but it never does, then yes, I become cynical.
It's been almost 2 years I left the CentOS team because I couldn't defend
the CentOS project anymore. The only thing solved was the ownership of
the CentOS name and domains, but all the other problems regarding code
transparency, trust-issues, missing or delayed updates, governance,
adding more people for redundancy, where the considerable ad income is
going, etc...
But I am preaching to the wrong choir, because you obviously know all
this.
http://dag.wieers.com/blog/leaving-centos-team-not-centos-community
At least with your involvement I am confident CentOS 4.9 will not be as
late as CentOS 4.8 was. (And this time I am not being cynical)
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]