On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > For the vast majority of packages, we make no changes. We rebuild it > and test it. If the binary passes the test, we use it. If the binary > does not pass the test we troubleshoot and figure out why it does not > pass the test ... and we change things OUTSIDE the SRPM to fix the > problem. Yes, and those changes are closed. But then again we first have to establish the notion that a CentOS release that is 2 or 3 months behind RHEL is a huge security problem to CentOS users (and probably to the CentOS infrastructure as well). I don't think it makes any sense to discuss the CentOS project's transparency if we cannot admit that we are doing a lousy job regarding our core business. The lack of competition in this space surely didn't help keeping us on our toes. -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]