On 02/19/2011 10:27 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Manuel Wolfshant > <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: >> On 02/20/2011 06:16 AM, js wrote: >>> Le 20/02/11 04:32, Dag Wieers a écrit : >>>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> >>>>> For the vast majority of packages, we make no changes. We rebuild it >>>>> and test it. If the binary passes the test, we use it. If the binary >>>>> does not pass the test we troubleshoot and figure out why it does not >>>>> pass the test ... and we change things OUTSIDE the SRPM to fix the >>>>> problem. >>>> Yes, and those changes are closed. >>>> >>>> But then again we first have to establish the notion that a CentOS release >>>> that is 2 or 3 months behind RHEL is a huge security problem to CentOS >>>> users (and probably to the CentOS infrastructure as well). >>>> >>>> I don't think it makes any sense to discuss the CentOS project's >>>> transparency if we cannot admit that we are doing a lousy job regarding >>>> our core business. The lack of competition in this space surely didn't >>>> help keeping us on our toes. >>>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> So, if for some reasons I want to rebuild a centos (for educational); It >>> will not work because of >>> missing "hack" never published? >> no, it will work once the person who wants to do the rebuild follows the >> instructions already published and uses the device named "brain". > > And casts a magic spell to find those instructions. I'm looking > through logs and wiki.centos.org, and having *real* difficulty finding > them. In particular, the bootstrapping configurations necessary to > build CentOS 6 from scratch on a CentOS 5.x machine seem missing, > especially access to the testing SRPM's that have already been patched > to work in a non-RHEL environment. > > Or do you see something I don't? Ummm ... we haven't even got CentOS 6 to build on CentOS 5 yet. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110219/1633ae3d/attachment-0007.sig>