Am 20.02.2011 um 18:13 schrieb Dag Wieers: > On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>> Could I ask a simple question: >>> When the Centos6 build (for i386 or x86_64) was release / build >>> at 100% >>> (or close) ? >> >> It might be 2 weeks from now or 2 months from now. I would like to >> think it will be closer to 2 weeks, but it will be completed when it >> gets completed. > > Johnny, > > So it's absolutely normal a CentOS 5.6 release is 10 weeks late and > there's no intent to speed up the process to lower the time to do > future > releases ? Dag, with all respect - polarizing doesn't help! RHEL5u6 is released 5 weeks ago (+2). > If that is the case, we might want to make that more clear on the > wiki, > eg. in my CentOS introduction presentation from 2008 we still > mention that > releases are (up to) 4 weeks behind RHEL. The actual process is slowing down caused by the concurrent appearance of RHEL4u9, RHEL5u6 and RHEL6. Right, one could argument that the problem lies here now. > I don't think most of the users ever expected to be without security > updates for 10 weeks or more when choosing CentOS, and that is an > important characteristic. Centos != RHEL and therefore this implies a time-window between update availability. Using this immanent fact against the team is counterproductive. PM