On Feb 21, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 20:44 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >> libuser-0.52.5-1.1.el4_8.1.src.rpm >> (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html), > > The correct SRPM for 5 being: libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.src.rpm , > CentOS-4 actually is up to date wrt this update. > Updates for both RHEL and CentOS are dead fish in a barrel on the web. Why not set up a web page listing any packages that RHEL has that CentOS does not? Endless recitations of out-of-date and available are just a foggy blur, lacking even US Homeland security BLUE <-> GREEN <-> PURPLE <-> LAVENDAR <-> color coding to minimize info overload. For extra credit: Calculate and display the lag between RHEL <-> CentOS releasing. And for those who simply MUST_BASH_CENTOS: mark all CentOS deficiencies in *BLINKING* RED 48pt type It likely isn't an enormous amount of PHP to get that job done. Alas C, not PHP, here, until I get to the RPM+PHP embedding todo++. hth 73 de Jeff -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4645 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110221/221997ae/attachment-0007.p7s>