Hi Dag, On 02/23/2011 10:01 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > No they can not. The bottom line is, people can try to reverse engineer > the process CentOS is using, but they may never be sure it's like what > CentOS did. So your statement is incorrect. I am not sure how to say this any other way, its been said many times over and over again : we dont use any super magic juice anywhere, its mostly just mock in a for loop. Lets assume that there still exists some fear and doubt somewhere about the process in exact terms. then lets take up the conversation on list where I said that once 6 is our of the door, I'll document what and how things worked for the build process ( including the pause's and why they took place. Would that remove some of this FUD layers ? > Hence my joke that the 'C' in CentOS actually means Closed. I dont agree, if you said 'C' in CentOS is mispelled 'Slower than ideal', I'd agree :) > That said, if CentOS wants it this way they sure have every right to do it > like this. But it would be nice to state that upfront. Propose a wording snippet ? - KB