Yes, it was another successful New Year's party at Lorri's house. I'm back home now. I'm ready for a long nap. :) - Mike On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Florian La Roche <Florian.LaRoche at gmx.net>wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Am 28.12.10 10:37, schrieb Filip Bartmann: > > > > > So why is CentOS development so closed? Why users can't have alphas, > > > or betas of this distro and must use some other rebuild as Scientific > > > Linux? > > > > One of the reasons is the sheer volume. CentOS is in use (wild educated > > guess here) on a massively larger scale than SL is. Just getting out the > > > For RHEL5 I have preferred CentOS as it stays more closely to upstream, > but given the number of very special cases that need to be considered for > the rebuild, I hope CentOS will catch all items that get reported by the > open Sientific Linux devel/test cycle. (This won't be too easy...) > > regards, > > Florian La Roche > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110101/ae3d5663/attachment-0007.html>