Charlie Brady wrote: > Please explain the logic. Why does the volume imply that CentOS > development must be closed? Why does the volume imply that there cannot be > alphas or betas? Do Fedora and Debian not also have large volume? > > Are there any plans to tackle the human bottleneck issues within the > CentOS development process? The invitation to contribute to the CentOS Project (aka those who *build* CentOS) is out there [1]. And CentOS is not "about" being on the cutting edge; it's provided free "to anyone who wishes to use it" [2]. I see no issues. gd [1] http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute [2] http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General