Hi John, On 01/05/2011 11:40 AM, JohnS wrote: > Karanbir, > > Can you look into closing out the bugs that can be closed etc? Yes, I will try and get to that either today or early in the day tomorrow. > Can also [1,2] be looked into to confirm package depends on abrt / > report (hidden gotchas). Look at the example spec file at the changes > that are required and the level of them that the Application Backend > will have to support. Is there someone that can take on the App Server > end? > > Also needed to know if you are symlinking from "redhat-release" to > "centos-release" or not. That depends on how other packages need to be > patched, ie "lsb_release". I am keen on looking at using a centos-release with a link over from redhat-release, but lets consider / look at the implications and fallouts before deciding on something for sure. There should not be any reason to patch redhat-lsb; whatever we do should not, ideally, have any impact on code and expectations from other apps ( specially since there might be implications to third party apps that we cant / dont want to have a feedback loop into ) What do you see as needing patched into redhat_lsb, that would fallout from the to-symlink or not-to-symlink decision ? > [1] http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4648 > [2] http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4647