Karanbir Singh wrote: > I am sure you can - there are a fair few request for patchs' in the > bugs.c.o interface, those pkgs are going to need patches :) I am going > to start from one end, if you want to pickup any specific ones, feel > free to do so. I assume you are referring to bugs.centos.org. I have created an account there and set my preferences to centos 6 and I see 47 entries with status entries of confirmed, feedback, acknowledge, new, assigned. I assume assigned are indeed that and don't need to be looked at. I guess the most of rest still need patches. I assume these are patches against the redhat source rpms. How do you want them submitted? I also assume severity "block" are first priority. Which end are you starting from. I assume numerical bug ID# tracker order. In building from Red Hat sources we also needed to patch several specs plus a couple of source files. Frakus submitted them upstream but they have not migrated through their process. Do you want those submitted? I think this is the area I prefer to work. I guess I will start at the high end and work backwards. > Also the code / branding audit isnt really quite done as > yet. So thats another option to start with > > - KB > _____________________________________________ Hubert > __ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > >