-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thus jean-sebastien Hubert spake: > Hello, > > Just a question: > > If the problem is about lack of openness in Centos project, why don't "fork" it? ok, Centos is already a "fork" of RHEL > > (Yes, it is), Scientific linux too (with some special packages for lab etc...): > > A fork is simple to do and maybe the community behind will be more open, more reactive ? > > Just a question ... not a troll (we are not Friday :) Honestly, I was thinking about it, but my levels of misanthropy raised to high during the thread consisting of people not really reading the other people's emails and not willing to understand their point of view. In case people decide to fork (forking from CentOS is pointless; it'd had to be a fork from RHEL, as you said above, but 'done right'), please PM me. Resources shouldn't be the problem (speaking of servers, housing them, etc). Best, Timo > Best regards, > > js -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNJYN7fg746kcGBOwRAhgbAJwPoQmkF0T6WR+sFDNRTw8oplnBGQCdG31+ xy5IlWhl+fwVAdNINZR/+3M= =6R+j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----