On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 21:21 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/05/2011 04:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Third-party proprietary programs which look for /etc/redhat-release are > > often (already in CentOS 5) confused by finding something other than an > > exact Red Hat version string there. There's really nothing we can do about > > that, although having separate files allows /etc/centos-release to contain > > the real information while local admins can edit /etc/redhat-release to have > > whatever e.g. Oracle is looking for. > > Sounds good to me, lets go with the symlink unless anyone comes up with > a reason not to ( and if so, please file at : #4593 ) Noted there John / em2