On 01/09/2011 05:00 AM, Cia Watson wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:22:09 +0100 > Ralph Angenendt<ralph.angenendt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am 09.01.11 00:33, schrieb Cia Watson: ... >> I'm not sure about the 6, it sticks out a bit, but that's not a real >> complaint. > > Thanks for the feedback. I should have compared the icon images on the > wiki artwork page a little more closely. I thought that using an xpm > image on the original would be better than using a png, but that wasn't > the case. I just uploaded revised files. > > I had the 6 stick out a bit so that it wouldn't look as if it's part of > the official logo, since it's a version number and all. It can be > moved if need be ... > > Cia W Here some of my thoughts: 1. The logo border are not well rendered. 2. 6 can be written with the official centos font : [1] 3. the version with pattern is really ugly, it doesn't look modern. [1] http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Fonts#head-19ea6e03a5bda7beb28ecb11993f632a02389295 -- Athmane Madjoudj