On 1/13/11, Hubert Bahr <hab at hbahr.org> wrote: > John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:59:10PM -0600, Hubert Bahr wrote: >>> A different perspective. RHEL-5, CentOS-5 no matter what point change >>> is essentially obsolete. Thus the need for RHEL-6, CentOS-6 which are >> >> Except for the whole "supported until 2014" thing >> >>> actually a couple of years late. How much has changed form 5.5 + >>> updates to 5.6. How many existing systems will use the iso's instead of >> >> Many will for new installs / rollouts where network installs, >> > Point made new installs/rollouts Non-sequitur, your facts are uncoordinated. Check back again when you think about more than one use case. jerry