On 07/11/2011 12:30 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 07/10/2011 11:12 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On 07/10/2011 10:44 PM, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>> i know c6 it is not released, but centos-release packages >>> was not upgraded when doing upgrade from 5.6 to 6.0 >>> (using upgradeany option). >>> >>> [root at server Packages]# rpm -Uvh centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm >>> warning: centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY >>> Preparing... ########################################### [100%] >>> package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 (which is newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64) is already installed >>> >>> i assume this was not tested because this upgrade method is not supported by upstream vendor. >> >> even though seems to be a serious bug:-( >> btw. not supported but working most of the cases. > > Why is this a bug? Afaik an epoch of 10 (the C5 rpm) trumps an epoch of > 0 (the C6 rpm). 10 > 0 so do not upgrade. and that's the problem... -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"