On 07/12/2011 11:39 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote: > Okay, so this CR repo is meant to be some kind of rolling (maybe similar > to SL's rolling repo)? In fact, there should not be a problem to get > back to the os/ updates/ repo as it's all about package versions. Of > course, if one switches back during a release, he/she will have a mixed > env, but it will be cleared on next point release. its actually not a rolling repo, in that you will need to have os/ and updates/ enabled in order to use CR/ for anye ffect, and rpms will be deleted from CR/ once a point release happens. So its not a case of opt-in, and leave it running forever ( we could do that as well, but before we end up with users tied in permanently, I feel it would be good to air the plan with the 6.0 -> 6.1 build cycle - ensure we are ticking the right boxs with the right sort of solution ) >> We are getting this ready for 6.0/CR/ at this very moment ( and it might >> be a few days before it starts seeing rpms ) - so if there are things >> that need bashed out or spoken about or design issues that concern >> anyone, now would be a great time to share > > Is it planned for the complete cycle or only till 6.1 has been finished? > Because it sounds like a good idea, in general. the process is in place for the 5.6/ to 5.7/ build cycle, I'm adapting that for 6.x now, the plan is to keep it in place and use it everytime there is a new release ( provided it works as expected ) - KB