On 07/11/2011 01:31 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Farkas Levente wrote: > >>> Why is this a bug? Afaik an epoch of 10 (the C5 rpm) trumps an epoch of >>> 0 (the C6 rpm). 10 > 0 so do not upgrade. >> >> and that's the problem... > > Let's see: > unsupported method upstream, right? > > It did not irk you enough to file a bug, right? > > Fix is trivial, right? unsupported method upstream, right. working in upstream, right. working in centos, not. the centos is compatible with upstream? no. is it a bug? yes. so it is a fud? no it was simple a bug report. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"