On 07/12/2011 08:11 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote: > Hi all. > > In general the release of CentOS 6 has been appreciated a lot in the > German-speaking countries. But a lot of ppl complained about how updates awesome1 > are handled in transition phases between minor releases (e.g. 5.5 to 5.6). erm, we addressed this a while back with the conversation about the CR process ( its even mentioned in the C6 announcement ) in a nutshell, there are 4 key facts : - all updates are provided in a sane build ( ie, some tests have been done and they *should* be all in a good state ); its not easy to isolate the SA's only, it would need to be everything - Its not dropped in by default, the user would need to make a manual choice to opt into this repo - We need to think about, put in place and execute a very visible and very focused education campeign to make sure that a large number of people are aware of its existance, know what the implications are, and have the facts they need to make a decision. - The process needs to gurantee an exit strategy / rebase to <rel>/os/ + <rel>/updates when a point release is publicly available with media. We are getting this ready for 6.0/CR/ at this very moment ( and it might be a few days before it starts seeing rpms ) - so if there are things that need bashed out or spoken about or design issues that concern anyone, now would be a great time to share - KB