On 07/19/2011 08:00 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > doing that much it is trivial to have a --repo line and a local copy of > the 22 packages that make up the spacewalk client report either as a > channel or a proper yum repo. I think part of the issue is that what repo would one point at in this manner ? if its the spacewalk tools, those are then not in sync with the rhn code in the distro. Having this code in the distro seems to imply that a lot more functionality could be shared between RHEL and CentOS installs. - KB