[CentOS-devel] CentOS 6 status update (relayed from the web forum)
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgThu Jun 2 16:13:42 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 6 status update (relayed from the web forum)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 6 status update (relayed from the web forum)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/02/2011 04:01 PM, Ferry Huberts wrote: >> it actually does not, the -c option was tried at the time as well. It >> turned out to be a bug in rsync itself ( in the 2.6.9 version ); who's >> to say there are no more of those! > > ah, that would be a problem yes ;-) I just realised that no mention was made of the problem - we had a situation in 5.2 release days where a repomd file with a clearly different timestamp was being considered by rsync to be identical, even with the -c flag on. Similarly we had issues with the comps-extras rpms being considered identical when they clearly were not, resigning the package also made no difference. > keep up the good work! thanks
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 6 status update (relayed from the web forum)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 6 status update (relayed from the web forum)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list