On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > Hi Karanbir, > > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 16:02 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >>> And while I further know that the project wouldn't sign packages that >>> I built here, I would still build packages here for my own purposes anyway. >> >> If the development process can churn via patches that get some sort of >> peer review, I dont see why the build+sign cant happen inside a centos >> builder instance. There is hardware for ia64/i586/sparc available. Keys >> are still something to look at further down the road. > > I had exactly this in mind when I was advocating for keeping SPEC files > and patches in git repositories ala git-buildpackage earlier on this > list. > So grab the SRPM's and import spec/patches into git. Its easier to do than to advocate imho. 73 de Jeff -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4645 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110603/aa27f3ad/attachment-0007.p7s>