Well fact is he's doing a better job relaying information then @CentOS, so it's not really fair for you to crucify him on the public milling list. After all this is the "Community" operating system, remember? On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>wrote: > A couple of posts on there are plain incorrect. I know Patrice has said > that he's maintaining it, but he's not doing anything in the QA process > and has opted out of doing anything for CentOS-6, so i'll take that with > a pinch of salt. > > Please consider qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa to be the -only- authoritative > source of info. > > Jeff has posted an update - I hope to get all those issues resolved this > weekend ( may of them already are, but wont get ticked off till QA guys > do their thing ). > > Also worth keeping in mind is that a vast majority of 6.0/ updates as > well as 6.1/ and updates from 6.1/ onward are already built ( majority > != all ). > > regards, > > - KB > -- Steven Crothers steven.crothers at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110618/d28f118e/attachment-0007.html>