On 06/21/2011 03:23 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> I think a whitelist to allow stuff through on a per rpm basis would be a >> better fit. > Or that. But given that the package list changes per release ( since RH > introduces new packages during the first half of the distro cycle ) a > blacklist might be easier to maintain. Especially as I do not [fore]see > many packages to be " forbidden ". To be reanalyzed when time comes ? I was thinking that once the packages start moving into the buildsystem, the whitelist will be empty : at that stage we just need some way for the QA team members to be able to click a link or enable a tick box somewhere and have it added to the whitelist. Also, i think we should have the basic rpm level tests running inside the buildsystem for 5.7, so that will be an additional point of reference / data point to consider ( and for fail's to get marked as such automatically ). - KB