[CentOS-devel] Updates from today

Trent Johnson centosdevel at trentjohnson.net
Fri Mar 11 02:30:27 UTC 2011

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote
> We do not change what upstream has in their SRPMS (except when we have
> to) ... we don't even unpack them unless we need to change them.  We
> submit them to mock to build.  Every patch we create, every change we
> make, it is in the SRPM.
> Why is this so hard to understand?

What are the differences (if any) between the build procedures
documented by Scientific Linux at the url below?

Would  Scientific Linux also be 100% binary compatible with upstream,
or are there other procedures followed by Centos to achieve the binary
compatibility goal?

More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list