[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
office at plnet.rs
Wed Mar 23 10:17:49 UTC 2011
Compare those 2 sentances:
> "The base SL distribution is basically Enterprise Linux, recompiled from
> "Q. What is Scientific Linux?
> A. Scientific Linux is in essence, a commercial enterprise linux
> distribution, recompiled.
and compare it with this statement:
"CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendors redistribution policy
and aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages
to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork)."
For me, "basically" and "in essence" is not as same as "aims to be 100%
If you can not see and understand, then I, or anyone else, can not help
you to understand the difference.
More information about the CentOS-devel