[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
John R. Dennison
jrd at gerdesas.com
Wed Mar 23 10:48:11 UTC 2011
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:43:53AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
>
> Both statements says the same with different words ... SL says
> "compatible" too, like CentOS ...
Honestly... This is a development list. If you need to have the
concept of binary compatibility explained to you then I fear you
are in the wrong place.
John
--
No government is perfect. One of the chief virtues of a democracy,
however, is that its defects are always visible and under democratic
processes can be pointed out and corrected.
-- Harry S Truman (1884 - 1972), 33rd US President, to a joint session
of the US Congress (12 March 1947), outlining what became known as
The Truman Doctrine
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110323/3a4c659e/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list