[CentOS-devel] All is well, don't believe the non-believers
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
office at plnet.rsWed Mar 2 20:06:05 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] All is well, don't believe the non-believers
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] All is well, don't believe the non-believers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen Cox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Zenon Panoussis <oracle at provocation.se> wrote: >> Can somebody please tell me why any of this wouldn't work? > > Z, > > The most relevant answer I can think of is: > > Karanbir Singh wrote "all updates to the /5/ tree are monitored and > anything which has a > remote or local exploit will get pushed into the /5/ tree; things in 5.6 > and against 5.6 that dont meet that criteria wait for 5.6 release. build > order, linking, inheriting upstream testing etc etc to blame" > Z has very interesting e-mail address. Oracle on domain without web site. Hm.....
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] All is well, don't believe the non-believers
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] All is well, don't believe the non-believers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list